|
Post by Retrovision on Jun 17, 2006 20:08:36 GMT -8
Aircraft Carrier to Become Canadian FerryReuters News Services/Annapolis MD 06/18/06 Report-Philip Heygood ...-30- REUTERS/z-ppg As my mom would say, " He thinks he's funny"
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jun 17, 2006 20:29:59 GMT -8
;DI just called BCF and they had no idea what I was talking about, AND the ship doesn't exist. Nice hoax, SERIOUSLY, it was well done! Please tell me that you're not serious about calling BCF about this ! ....and you're saying that the name " Benedict Arnold" for a USA Warship didn't mean anything to you ??
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Jun 17, 2006 20:30:46 GMT -8
Hornbyguy, I suggest you get off your computer cause the mod-squad is going to be after you on the most wanted list. Still, good satire wtih that.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jun 17, 2006 20:32:42 GMT -8
Hornbyguy, I suggest you get off your computer cause the mod-squad is going to be after you on the most wanted list. The mod-squad loves HornbyGuy, and is a proud supporter of his creative endevours.
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Jun 17, 2006 20:36:22 GMT -8
Mr. Sarcastic, I meant as in you will be after him to do what a rock star would do and give him the wave, and also you should downsize that pic and make it your display pics.
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Jun 17, 2006 21:27:35 GMT -8
;DI just called BCF and they had no idea what I was talking about, AND the ship doesn't exist. Nice hoax, SERIOUSLY, it was well done! Oh, come on, BC Ferries will deny anything.They just don't want to admit to us what's really going on. 'Nanaimo had some great ideas for developing the service past what the original story reported. I think we're really looking at a revolution in ferry service. As a way of letting bygones be bygones, BC Ferries is thinking (I'm told) of re naming the new ship, the MV Glen Clark. Has a nice ring to it.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jun 17, 2006 21:32:13 GMT -8
re Quote "BC Ferries is thinking (I'm told) of re naming the new ship, the MV Glen Clark. Has a nice ring to it."
The MV Glen Clark would be the first BC Ferry since the Bainbridge with a wooden-deck, but this would just be a small wooden sun-deck.
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Jun 17, 2006 21:36:11 GMT -8
But it would be upgraded! With no hanky panky!
|
|
|
Post by EGfleet on Jun 18, 2006 7:18:09 GMT -8
;DI just called BCF and they had no idea what I was talking about, AND the ship doesn't exist. Nice hoax, SERIOUSLY, it was well done! I couldn't understand why there would be an aircraft carrier named "Benedict Arnold" who was a traitor as far as American history books are concerned: United States general and traitor in the American Revolution; in 1780 his plan to surrender West Point to the British was foiled (1741-1801) Not someone you'd name a US vessel after.
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Jun 18, 2006 21:59:27 GMT -8
this was quite an interesting " Rorschach" type test, to me atleast. Thanks, everyone, for the Entertainment, Graham J.
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Jun 19, 2006 9:18:48 GMT -8
Cascade- I am truly sorry that I did not treat your issue with the gravity it deserved. Given the weight of your previous posts, and the accumulation of rumors and speculation, not to mention your creating a second thread for this topic, I should have been more sensitive to it's obvious importance, and shouldn't have indulged in such facetiousness. I will try to behave better in future, and not muddy the waters with tales of aircraft carriers, and dead horses.
I appreciate your remarks on what you do for the benefit of this forum's members. I suppose I should try to live up to those standards, myself.
David Hahn made a statement on what BC Ferries aims might be with the Sidney terminal. Being a bit of a dullard, and not having your flair for lively speculation and maginative rumoring, I think I'll just go with that for now.
Humbly yours, Hornbyguy.
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Jun 19, 2006 10:01:21 GMT -8
Cascade, some people have been known to take action on this and find out, sometimes the load of effort to put into it is high. sometimes it is low. We do not know if this is suppposed to be kept behind the closed doors but I consider it up in the air right now. If BCF is keeping this behind closed doors, we cant get any more information. That's the bottom line
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Jun 19, 2006 11:10:29 GMT -8
If you considered what WMG has done, you might as well limit their prime real estate options for a ferry terminal and it can also bring in some more revenue if BCFS owns a terminal cause now it charges WSF to use the Sidney Terminal. There has been some speculation into a closed door partnership with the fast cat operation still rumored.
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Jun 22, 2006 9:17:26 GMT -8
How about I ask this, are we playing 20 questions or do we look like insiders?
|
|
|
Post by Mike C on Jun 22, 2006 9:18:40 GMT -8
Next refit is probabaly next fall, space filled by the Queen of Vancouver.
There's one other one, the Queen of Esquimalt, sister/cousin to the Saanich. Others possibly converted include the Queen of Nanaimo/Burnaby. The C's have a low clearence, so they can't really take trucks.
|
|
|
Post by hergfest on Jun 22, 2006 11:15:44 GMT -8
They won't convert the Saanich until the Super C's arrive. They need the platforms on the Saanich when she is on Route 1.
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Jun 22, 2006 14:20:35 GMT -8
The C's have a low clearence, so they can't really take trucks. So... QB Teen, how do trucks get to the Sunshine Coast, then? Aside from removing platform decks, what 'conversion' can be done to ferries which already have full truck carrying car decks? You could remove the platform decks and call the Queen of Saanich a 'truck ferry' if you wanted, but why would you not use the upper car deck, and the passenger capacity? What I'm saying is that most of the ferries are 'truck ferries' already, with additional auto capacity.
|
|
|
Post by EGfleet on Jun 22, 2006 15:01:16 GMT -8
The C's have a low clearence, so they can't really take trucks. So... QB Teen, how do trucks get to the Sunshine Coast, then? Aside from removing platform decks, what 'conversion' can be done to ferries which already have full truck carrying car decks? You could remove the platform decks and call the Queen of Saanich a 'truck ferry' if you wanted, but why would you not use the upper car deck, and the passenger capacity? What I'm saying is that most of the ferries are 'truck ferries' already, with additional auto capacity. And would B.C. Ferries really want to put the money into that kind of a project with a 43 year old vessel?
|
|
|
Post by Mike C on Jun 22, 2006 17:05:14 GMT -8
EvergreenFleet: It's an oppertunity to conitnue to use BCF's Major "Workhorse" vessel. As opposed to a C class, which has much oppertunity.
HornbyGuy: The C class has good clearence already, just not as enough as the Queen of Alberni or Queen of New Westminster.
The removal of the platform decks was meant to increase truck capacity, so they would be able to fit trucks in all lanes of the New West, like the Queen of Alberni. I'm not sure, but they also could have raised the ceiling on the New West when they added the extra deck. I'm not sure, this rumour seems to be coming from way up on the status charts at BC Ferries.
|
|
|
Post by QSaanich on Jun 22, 2006 19:23:58 GMT -8
What the hell are they doing to the saanich i am speech less.
|
|
|
Post by QSaanich on Jun 22, 2006 19:27:08 GMT -8
Also this is a JOKE bcf are not going to do this becuase this ship would be too big to fit in our docks ok this is a JOKe ;D
|
|
Doug
Voyager
Lurking within...the car deck.
Posts: 2,213
|
Post by Doug on Jun 22, 2006 19:37:36 GMT -8
The clearance is the same on all the major vessels of the fleet. It is that there is a full deck of space on the Alberni and New Wesminster that makes them "truck" ferries. However, the New West does indeed have a slightly higher upper vehicle deck.
|
|