|
Post by Kahloke on Apr 10, 2014 6:06:49 GMT -8
I was looking at the Damen Shipyard site looking for the new Newfoundland Ferries, and found this article on the new vessels. It got me thinking that this might be a pretty good template for a future Northern Discovery should BC Ferries ever bring Route 40 back, or it may even work pretty well as the Discovery Coast Connector, certainly better than Nimpkish. Stats: length - 80m speed - 14 kts cars - 60AEQ pass - 200 Have a look at the article. I particularly like the simulated video at the bottom of the page www.damen.com/en/news/2013/12/second-80-m-ice-class-ferry-to-newfoundland-and-labrador-province
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jul 1, 2015 16:06:44 GMT -8
A new Nimpkish? Minister Stone(d) is admitting in this article that all is NOT well with the Discovery Coast 'Connector'. From the Williams Lake Tribune (Black Press) here.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jul 1, 2015 16:40:48 GMT -8
A new Nimpkish? Minister Stone(d) is admitting in this article that all is NOT well with the Discovery Coast 'Connector'. Another example of the sham of the semi-private notion of BCFerries. Stone announces a new ship and a timeline. It's pretty arrogant of the Minister to bypass the ferry company in this matter, when at the same time he's telling the ferry company to figure-out everything else on its own. Oh, I get it now. Because there's a good-news spin to this announcement, the Minister had to make it, to earn political points. ------------- All that being said, I am interested in the specifics of what the new ship might be.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jul 1, 2015 16:52:11 GMT -8
A new thread to discuss and share news about what might be a new ship by 2018 or so.
Minister Stone announced this idea recently.
Big thanks to Mr. Wett Coast for finding the story.
|
|
|
Post by Mike on Jul 1, 2015 17:05:13 GMT -8
A new Nimpkish? Minister Stone(d) is admitting in this article that all is NOT well with the Discovery Coast 'Connector'. Another example of the sham of the semi-private notion of BCFerries. Stone announces a new ship and a timeline. It's pretty arrogant of the Minister to bypass the ferry company in this matter, when at the same time he's telling the ferry company to figure-out everything else on its own. Oh, I get it now. Because there's a good-news spin to this announcement, the Minister had to make it, to earn political points. ------------- All that being said, I am interested in the specifics of what the new ship might be. Perhaps this is actually an announcement of the beginning of a 3 year refit for the "new" vessel to be named Northern Chilliwack?
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jul 1, 2015 17:17:03 GMT -8
Perhaps this is actually an announcement of the beginning of a 3 year refit for the "new" vessel to be named Northern Chilliwack? Given the Minister's knowledge of things maritime, and his track record in describing ships, I'm thinking that there are many possibilities of what this "new ship" might be. A patched-up Tenaka ? A re-born Chillywack ? A real newbuild from Remontowa ? A Steilacoom II extended deck vessel, built at Lummi Island ? Or the Baynes Sound Connector, towed by SS Master ?
|
|
|
Post by Kahloke on Jul 1, 2015 17:19:41 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jul 1, 2015 17:30:26 GMT -8
Or the Baynes Sound Connector, towed by SS Master ? ROTFLMAO... And it would fulfill the Minister's statement "The new ferry will be a modern ship with all the modern amenities and fully accessible".
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jul 1, 2015 17:38:32 GMT -8
Something similar to what Newfoundland has ordered for their new Fogo Island / Change Islands ferry would be nice to have. That ferry can carry 60 vehicles and 200 passengers. See article: Something purpose-built sure would be nice.
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Jul 1, 2015 19:44:15 GMT -8
I wonder how a vessel based on the design of the Steel-Electrics (Post 1980's Rebuild) would work. A 55-car double-ender with two elevators, men&women's washrooms, and a Coast Cafe Express that could stand in on other routes during off-season. Just a thought.
|
|
|
Post by Mike C on Jul 1, 2015 20:22:59 GMT -8
I wonder how a vessel based on the design of the Steel-Electrics (Post 1980's Rebuild) would work. A 55-car double-ender with two elevators, men&women's washrooms, and a Coast Cafe Express that could stand in on other routes during off-season. Just a thought. This is a 90 year old ferry design with a shallow draft hull, open deck ends, and none of the passenger and safety features necessary to operate in open ocean. Possibly one of the least likely candidates for a design, along with a small two person pedal-boat, and a log boat from Disneyland's Splash Mountain. Absolutely no way this would be certified, let alone make it past the consultation process.
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Jul 2, 2015 1:48:44 GMT -8
Well this is a surprising development. The fact that it's coming from the man who gave such a rave review of the Nimpkish last year makes it even more of a surprise. Though personally, I think this kind of thing had to happen, even if it was just an upgraded Tenaka.
Whether this vessel is a "Newbuild" or not is certainly up for debate.
If it's indeed a newbuild, perhaps the 'Northern Discovery' is back from the dead! Though the originally proposed 60 vehicle capacity might be changed since that plan was made up before the elimination of Route 40. It would be wise though for BC Ferries to make this vessel capable of serving Routes 10 and 11 if the need ever arose. The vessel Kahloke posted above or something similar would be a perfect basis to go off of if they went that route. Though I don't expect something that extravagant since 10a as it is now runs entirely in protected water. The only thing I'm concerned about is the timeframe Stone stated. Being just under 3 years, that's pretty quick for a vessel the public didn't even know was being considered until yesterday. This makes me think the vessel will be a fairly small one. Maybe an enclosed or partially enclosed vessel comparable in size to the NIP? Hey, you never know, the NIP will have to be replaced around 2019, maybe the Nimpkish plan will tie in with the NIP's replacement. Wishful thinking?
If it's not a newbuild though, they have to either buy a vessel, or use an existing vessel. Buying a vessel IMO is more likely since they could easily find a number of them around the world and have one ready by 2018. Course there's always a chance a vessel of suitable size and age isn't on the market. As for existing vessels, there's probably two candidates and they're both sitting unused at Deas right now. There's the Tenaka, which would need an extensive upgrade to keep her going. Though BC Ferries has suggested a number of times the last few years that the Tenaka's days might be numbered. The other option is putting the Queen of Chilliwack back in that area to at least get some use out of the millions of dollars they spent on that upgrade. It would be overkill though if the Wack ran during the offseason, plus she'd require more crew than the Nimpkish and Tenaka combined, and then there's the rumours the Wack is up for sale... So in conclusion, neither of those vessels is likely to run 10a.
Still plenty of questions that need to be answered though. Hopefully we get more details real soon.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jul 2, 2015 7:50:23 GMT -8
I can't see them going with a vessel larger than about 40 cars. The design might be something like a much scaled down version of the new 'intermediates' currently under construction in Poland.
Going with a larger vessel of sixty cars similar to the new Newfoundland vessel just might make a few of the Socred-Liberal government supporters scratch their heads and wonder just why there was the hurry to ditch the Wack & route 40.
|
|
|
Post by westernflyer on Jul 2, 2015 8:23:59 GMT -8
Anyone had a look at the Kvaloy? , It's a 2011 Remontowa built ferry operated in Norway by Torghatten Nord AS.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jul 2, 2015 10:34:42 GMT -8
Anyone had a look at the Kvaloy? , It's a 2011 Remontowa built ferry operated in Norway by Torghatten Nord AS. This looks like an excellent design although auto capacity looks too small.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jul 2, 2015 18:48:19 GMT -8
I have yet to find any sort of acknowledgement from BC Ferry Services (the company) regarding Todd Stone(d)'s pronouncement re the new vessel to replace the Nimpkish. Could it be that he neglected to talk to BCFS before talking to the media?
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jul 2, 2015 19:56:57 GMT -8
I have yet to find any sort of acknowledgement from BC Ferry Services (the company) regarding Todd Stone(d)'s pronouncement re the new vessel to replace the Nimpkish. Could it be that he neglected to talk to BCFS before talking to the media? Here's the lead line from the news article: So presumably there are discussions/dictations already underway. Perhaps Minister Stone was premature in announcing the almost-agreement for a new ship. He must have had a political reason for doing so.
|
|
|
Post by Starsteward on Jul 3, 2015 11:41:05 GMT -8
Or the Baynes Sound Connector, towed by SS Master ? ROTFLMAO... And it would fulfill the Minister's statement "The new ferry will be a modern ship with all the modern amenities and fully accessible". Minister Stone's announcement of a "new", "modern amenities", "fully accessible" ship to be deployed on the sad entrails of Route 40, must have come as a bit of a wee surprise to the management 'suits' at BC Ferries. One could forgive the management suits at BCF head office if they were a bit confused as to just what Minister Stone was referring to as: new, modern, and fully accessible. After all, wasn't it BC Ferries mandate to who plan any additions or subtractions from their fleet? (Keeping in mind that it's Uncle Todd who is adding or subtracting the 'zeros amount' on the yearly subsidy cheque, isn't it)? Little wonder we have a messy dysfunctional maritime transportation system on our coast eh?
|
|
|
Post by roeco on Jul 29, 2015 15:09:34 GMT -8
Im not sure what other existing vessel in the Fleet could do or be modified for a Discovery Coast connector service cause it would be a huge waste to purpose build one unless they were gonna put actual Route 40 back into service and run a service up on the North Coast the way it should be done. Summer should be Inside Passage every 2nd day direct PH-PR. And Route 40 two direct trips Port Hardy to Bella Coola, and one milk run trip per week via Bella Bella. Extend the season like mid May to mid Sept at minimum.
|
|
|
Post by Dane on Nov 1, 2015 18:53:48 GMT -8
Probably (actually certainly) too large, but looks like the "Nova Star" may be available cheap! This isn't too serious a suggestion as the interest in developing Northern tourism via ferries by our current government is essentially nil, but it is sort of rare to see vessels like this in North America for sale. That said I'm not actually certain the vessel is for sale, but rather seized for value to pay off debts. Ship - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Nova_StarUncertain Status - www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/nova-star-seizure-1.3298863
|
|
Mill Bay
Voyager
Long Suffering Bosun
Posts: 2,887
|
Post by Mill Bay on Nov 1, 2015 21:06:27 GMT -8
Probably (actually certainly) too large, but looks like the "Nova Star" may be available cheap! This isn't too serious a suggestion as the interest in developing Northern tourism via ferries by our current government is essentially nil, but it is sort of rare to see vessels like this in North America for sale. That said I'm not actually certain the vessel is for sale, but rather seized for value to pay off debts. Ship - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Nova_StarUncertain Status - www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/nova-star-seizure-1.3298863 Way too huge, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Apr 27, 2016 9:37:42 GMT -8
Occasionally when he wants to, Minister Stone speaks for BC Ferries. Here's a recent quote regarding the Nimpkish replacement: from HERE
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Sept 6, 2016 11:41:49 GMT -8
Here's the BC Government announcement to start things off: The WCFF brief: - seasonal direct ferry service between Port Hardy & Bella Coola - target start-up for Summer 2018 - search underway for an appropriate used vessel ================= from HERE
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Sept 6, 2016 12:18:42 GMT -8
This quote from the Premier is correct. Right service: - The most popular part of old Route-40 was the direct day trips between Port Hardy & Bella Coola. That was the right service, and it's been missed since 2013. It will be good to get that back. Right vessel: - It's been well documented and discussed here on this forum that the old Queen of Chilliwack was not a well-suited vessel to this route, because of slow speed, rolling ride in the open water, and poor passenger area design. It will be good if they can get a ship that is better suited to the new route.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 12:42:12 GMT -8
Nothing like a pending election to get the Premier and her Ministers to suddenly realize that they might get a few more votes if they make a two year "promise" that they can back out of if things don't go their way. They have done their best to destroy the economy of the region, now they get all cheery and offer too little too late. I'll believe it when I see it.
|
|