|
Post by DENelson83 on Feb 8, 2009 17:59:08 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by BreannaF on Feb 8, 2009 21:41:28 GMT -8
OK, so I'm trying to figure out what she actually did: The headline says she swam across the Atlantic Ocean. Her business manager says no one could possibly swim across the Ocean. Apparently someone has swam across the ocean, in 73 days. That didn't take years. She did something for 24 days. But I'm not sure what, from the article. Whatever it was, it was more of a feat than anything I could ever hope to do. I'll give her credit for that. But, somewhere, I'm missing something here. ================================================== The following WAS going to be my original response to this thread: "In further news today, Washington State Ferries announced that they would propose some changes to their 'Plan B' for cutting services to tthe bare bones due to economic difficulties in the state. After reading an article about a woman swimming across the Atlantic Ocean, it seems that they have a new plan for getting commuters from Bremerton to Seattle using no ferry boats at all. ..." Reference was then made to the accompanying article.
|
|
|
Post by SS San Mateo on Feb 11, 2009 11:20:09 GMT -8
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,196
|
Post by Neil on Feb 11, 2009 12:19:42 GMT -8
This wasn't a hoax. I recall reading about her swim before it began- either in the Globe & Mail, or the New York Times. It was made clear that she wasn't going to be swimming the whole distance, and I wondered what the point of it was.
That some media outlets reported this as a trans-atlantic swim in the proper sense is more a testimonial to incredibly sloppy reporting and are-you-smarter-than-a-first-grader math skills. There may also have been a bit of selective emphasis on the part of the people involved in this curious adventure.
|
|