|
Post by Retrovision on Jan 22, 2007 10:56:31 GMT -8
Here are BC Ferries' route numbers and corresponding terminals:
Route 1 : Tsawwassen - Swartz Bay
Route 2 : Horseshoe Bay - Departure Bay
Route 3 : Horseshoe Bay - Langdale
Route 4 : Swartz Bay - Fulford Harbour
Route 5 : Swartz Bay - Outer Gulf Islands
Route 6 : Crofton - Vesuvius
Route 7 : Earls Cove - Saltery Bay
Route 8 : Horseshoe Bay - Snug Cove
Route 9 : Tsawwassen - S. Gulf Islands
Route 10 : Port Hardy - Prince Rupert
Route 11 : Prince Rupert - Queen Charlottes
Route 12 : Mill Bay - Brentwood Bay
Route 13 : Langdale - Gambier - Keats
Route 17 : Comox - Powell River
Route 18 : Powell River - Texada
Route 19 : Nanaimo Harbour - Gabriola
Route 20 : Chemainus - Thetis - Kuper
Route 21 : Buckley Bay - Denman
Route 22 : Denman - Hornby
Route 23 : Campbell River - Quadra
Route 24 : Quadra - Cortes
Route 25 : Port McNeill - Alert Bay - Sointula
Route 26 : Skidegate - Alliford Bay
Route 30 : Tsawwassen - Duke Point
Route 40 : Port Hardy - Mid-coast
For route descriptions see our administrator's website, The Ferry Terminal:
www.geocities.com/ferries_bc/routes_bcf.html
|
|
|
Post by Dane on Jan 22, 2007 14:23:13 GMT -8
I aksed that once - it's for area where expansion/signifigant changes were once thought to be on the way (read: passenger only service, YVR terminal)
|
|
Koastal Karl
Voyager
Been on every BC Ferry now!!!!!
Posts: 7,747
|
Post by Koastal Karl on Jan 22, 2007 20:56:25 GMT -8
Ok I never noticed they go from route 13 to 17, hmm! I have always wondered why they go from route 26 to 30 to 40. Anyone know?? So how many routes does BC Ferries actually have if you count the 30 and 40 as two more that makes 28 routes not 40 routes. Dosent make sense why they do it like that.
|
|
|
Post by kylefossett on Jan 23, 2007 16:31:11 GMT -8
i have counted 25. the gap in numbers is probably for new routes out of those areas. example- a new midcoast area route would then be 41
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Jan 23, 2007 17:57:06 GMT -8
i have counted 25. the gap in numbers is probably for new routes out of those areas. example- a new midcoast area route would then be 41 The same as how transit systems go about creating new route numbers.
|
|
|
Post by BrianWilliams on Feb 8, 2007 0:15:38 GMT -8
Route numbers are kinda interesting.
The list shows that a lot of routes were just numbered sequentially as they went into service - but more recently BCF has given some thought to holding blocks of numbers open for region-specific designations, like the "41" you suggest.
If we started over, we'd probably use single digits (1-9) for the highest volume routes, 10's thru 90's for regional service, and 101-999 for little island hoppers.
It's not very important to the public: most ferry travellers never know the route # they're sailing on.
|
|
|
Post by Hardy on Feb 8, 2007 10:40:49 GMT -8
The same as how transit systems go about creating new route numbers. As a captive (but avid) bus rider in the sLower Mainland, I am intrigued by what you mean by this. Care to elaborate?
|
|
|
Post by kylefossett on Feb 8, 2007 16:04:59 GMT -8
The same as how transit systems go about creating new route numbers. As a captive (but avid) bus rider in the sLower Mainland, I am intrigued by what you mean by this. Care to elaborate? i don't know about the rest of the fraser valley lower mainland region but in mission and abbotsford, the abbotsford routes all number upto 17. mission routes start at 31. this is for future route expansion. mission routes will be numbered from were they are now and abbotsford routes would be numbered upto the mission routes
|
|