|
Post by Shane on Oct 28, 2006 6:15:16 GMT -8
The Picture explains it all... Norther Explorer(If that's her name)...In Juneau? Why not Prince Rupert or something? Do you think this picture could mean something, for the future?
|
|
Koastal Karl
Voyager
Been on every BC Ferry now!!!!!
Posts: 7,747
|
Post by Koastal Karl on Oct 28, 2006 8:27:21 GMT -8
hmm, never thought of where that photo could of been. I always thought it was Prince Rupert. But that's interesting. If they went to Alaska they would be in competition with Alaska State Ferries but I dont know if BC Ferries want to go international. That would be a good name for the northern ship.
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Oct 28, 2006 9:13:41 GMT -8
Northern Explorer is something original. I will not mind if the new northern vessels are named northern but I don't want to see another fiasco. Shane, looks can be deceving just FYI.
|
|
|
Post by Shane on Oct 28, 2006 11:11:55 GMT -8
Does anyone think that BCF has ever considered limited service to Alaska? I know in the 80's they offered limited service to Kincolith(North of Prince Rupert), but my knowledge is limited to that detail, anyone know more about this?
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Oct 28, 2006 11:48:32 GMT -8
Northern Explorer would be a good name.
But service to Alaska? It's a possibility. I could see a Route like Tsawwassen-Port Hardy-Prince Rupert-Juneau.
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Oct 28, 2006 12:26:14 GMT -8
Alaska would be logical before the Olympics and after for people in Alaska to get down to BC. Who knows?
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Oct 28, 2006 13:38:51 GMT -8
Hmmmm...That would be a good idea having that for the olympics. They could easily have a Juneau-Vancouver route. during the Olympics Period.
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Oct 28, 2006 13:43:35 GMT -8
I notice that in that picture you can see the reflection is a Cruise Ship so they basically just replaced a picture of a cruise ship with the ferry
|
|
|
Post by Shane on Oct 28, 2006 14:19:02 GMT -8
Why doesn't BCF just try to make a good(Or real) picture? heh...
|
|
|
Post by founder on Oct 28, 2006 14:20:11 GMT -8
Can't make a real picture...The ship isn't built lol.
|
|
|
Post by Shane on Oct 28, 2006 14:24:21 GMT -8
I'm refering to the fleet pictures on BCF's website...
|
|
|
Post by Dane on Oct 28, 2006 17:09:53 GMT -8
I'm gonna take a stab at this and guess that the PR person doesn't have a clue, nor do they care, nor do they really need too. Only we, and perhaps Alaska residents who for some reason looked at the picture would notice.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Oct 28, 2006 19:29:37 GMT -8
When I first looked at this picture I thought that the location might be Bella Coola. I will take someone's word that it is in fact Alaska. I suspect someone just found a picture that looked 'northern' and just photo shopped the artist's concept of the new vessel into the picture. That is it. In another picture they photo shopped this vessel onto a QotN postcard.
It is very unlikely that BCF will be operating vessels into Alaska any time soon, especially in mid winter during the Olympics. I highly doubt BCF northern service vessels will see much of a spike in traffic during the Games, unless Prince Rupert's 'All Native Basketball' tournament happens at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Oct 28, 2006 19:40:06 GMT -8
I'm gonna take a stab at this and guess that the PR person doesn't have a clue, nor do they care, nor do they really need too... So, as should be the same with politics, your next questions are "how are we going to change this?" and "why are people so apathetic?" - right? ...Sorry, I guess that I should count you among the majority and not assume such things.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Oct 28, 2006 20:19:47 GMT -8
I'm gonna take a stab at this and guess that the PR person doesn't have a clue, nor do they care, nor do they really need too... So, as should be the same with politics, your next questions are "how are we going to change this?" and "why are people so apathetic?" - right? ...Sorry, I guess that I should count you among the majority and not assume such things. As for me, I don't care. Don't have the energy to complain or assert my whatever-rights about something like a bad photo-chop.
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Oct 28, 2006 20:39:15 GMT -8
So, as should be the same with politics, your next questions are "how are we going to change this?" and "why are people so apathetic?" - right? ...Sorry, I guess that I should count you among the majority and not assume such things. As for me, I don't care. Don't have the energy to complain or assert my whatever-rights about something like a bad photo-chop. Thank you, Mr. Horn, for the best rendition of why our political system, so-called "democracy", will never work in the way it's intended to, that I've heard yet.
|
|
|
Post by hergfest on Oct 28, 2006 21:23:54 GMT -8
Why would BC Ferries take business away from Alaska State Ferries?
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Oct 28, 2006 21:34:29 GMT -8
I gotta say, this whole thread is majorly wierd. The bizarreness of BC Ferries going to Alaska, the curious political remarks.... you've lost me.
|
|
|
Post by markkarj on Oct 28, 2006 21:43:18 GMT -8
I don't think BC Ferries would go north to Alaska for a few reasons.
The Sonia and QPR replacement will probably not add a lot of extra capacity to the existing runs, which I understand are quite busy during the summer. And the summer is probably the time when a cruise to Alaska on board a ferry would make the most financial sense.
So even if it made sense to do during the summer, BC Ferries probably wouldn't have the capacity to accomplish it. There would probably be a number of costs with such a service too, in terms of customs clearance, any maritime regulations associated with sailing into the US, etc.
Also, what could BC Ferries offer that the Alaska Marine Highway doesn't already?
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Oct 28, 2006 21:55:00 GMT -8
Why would BC Ferries take business away from Alaska State Ferries? Why would Seattle build a multi-million dollar cruise-ship terminal on their historic and central waterfront?
|
|
Doug
Voyager
Lurking within...the car deck.
Posts: 2,213
|
Post by Doug on Oct 28, 2006 23:48:13 GMT -8
I don't think there is that big of a market in Alaska...so I doubt BC Ferries would try and compete with AHMS.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Oct 29, 2006 8:14:21 GMT -8
I don't think BC Ferries would go north to Alaska. If Johnny Horton were in charge of BC Ferries, then I'm sure they'd go north, to Alaska. (it's obscure, look it up on google, or just move on)
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Nov 1, 2006 0:21:03 GMT -8
Isn't that one of the possibilities that Graham Clark was investigating for his buisness interests when he was aboard the Queen of the North on March 22?
|
|
|
Post by Scott on Nov 1, 2006 20:16:02 GMT -8
I think there is a demand - for it. Look at the current Cruise ship business - plus add in a younger sector who would like to get off somewhere and drive back down or drive up - then you have a good business - which would be beneficial to a lot of the smaller ports / towns. Why not play the Yanks at there own game?? I don't know a lot of people who would want to drive to/from Alaska. I wouldn't mind doing it once, but it's a long long drive to anywhere in Alaska. You've got two main "cities" on the Alaska Panhandle, that's Juneau (Alaska's capital city, with no road access) and Haines/Skagway. Juneau's population is 30,000 and I doubt the population of Haines/Skagway are even half that. Alaska ferries already serves these ports. From the Alaska Panhandle, it's a long jump to anywhere, and it's all in open waters. Alaska ferries rarely even crosses the Gulf of Alaska to places like Anchoirage or Valdez. They operate on that side of the Gulf too, but they rarely cross it. I doubt there would be a demand for a ferry service between Vancouver and Anchorage. The government wouldn't subsidize it and so it would have to make at least a little money. It would cost a fortune. If it was done right, there could be a business opportunity in doing what the old steamships did, visiting smaller ports and carrying cargo/vehicles/passengers. There might also be opportunity to run a year round cruise ship out of Vancouver, returning to Vancouver. However, both these ventures would require completely different ships than what BC Ferries has or is building.
|
|
Neil
Voyager
Posts: 7,307
|
Post by Neil on Nov 1, 2006 23:03:24 GMT -8
Even if we remove the off-the-wall notion of BC Ferries serving Alaska, this idea still doesn't really fly.
The Alaska cruise market is pretty much saturated. Americans are moving in increasing numbers out of Seattle, not Vancouver, and the prospects for future growth from Vancouver is not bright. Simply put, there are quite enough vessels serving Alaska.
If you added a 'cruise ferry' into the mix, where would vehicle drivers want to disembark? Kitimat? What tourist wants to go there, and there's no terminal. Not Prince Rupert- that's already served by ferry. Not the Alaska panhandle- you can't drive anywhere from there. The 'ice fields', likewise, have no road connection anywhere. There may be a few well heeled travellers who might make the long haul to Prince William Sound, but the Whittier- Anchorage area is served by ferry from the panhandle already in summer, and who knows what might be involved in using an unsuitable Alaska State Ferries terminal. Likewise, I can see some people wanting a day cruise from Vancouver to Port Hardy, but not a lot, and the Bear Cove terminal is BC Ferries territory, and probably not adaptable to just any boat.
Now, if you were talking a small, 'pocket cruiser', along the lines of what the Prince George was going to be, several years back; sailing the BC and Alaska coast, and going into some areas the bigger ships can't access- maybe that might be more do-able. I just can't see it working with cars.
|
|