|
|
Post by tzinquaw on Aug 4, 2005 14:29:50 GMT -8
What type of Bcferries vessel should be built to replace some of the vessels, and which ones?
Tzinquaw
|
|
|
|
Post by Quinsam on Aug 4, 2005 14:36:13 GMT -8
he means the routes, what routes should they go on, he is on my dad's pc, he is my friend  |
|
|
|
Post by Quinsam on Aug 4, 2005 14:49:53 GMT -8
Whoever voted other vessel Please stand up!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ferryman on Aug 4, 2005 15:04:44 GMT -8
*Standing Up*....It would be cool to see ferries like the Osprey down here. But wasn't it designed to go in Lakes? But I'm sure if they used that design anyway they would modify it for the Salt Water.
|
|
|
|
Post by harbourlynx on Aug 4, 2005 16:27:29 GMT -8
More Cumberland Classes for BC!
|
|
|
|
Post by megz on Aug 4, 2005 17:01:14 GMT -8
I like the double ended ones ;D
|
|
Koastal Karl
Voyager 
Been on every BC Ferry now!!!!!
Posts: 7,747
|
Post by Koastal Karl on Aug 4, 2005 17:05:57 GMT -8
More Cappy and Cumbie class ferries! Cumbie's awesome!!
|
|
Doug
Voyager
Lurking within...the car deck.
Posts: 2,213
|
Post by Doug on Aug 4, 2005 17:38:12 GMT -8
Others...what ROUTE are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
Post by Quinsam on Aug 4, 2005 17:42:02 GMT -8
What ferries should be built and what route should they be put on, say the route in your replies
|
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Aug 4, 2005 17:46:16 GMT -8
standing too
|
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Aug 4, 2005 20:47:56 GMT -8
Id pick more Cap and Cumbie types longer and smaller if I had to pick something else id want new Tsawwassen types
|
|
|
|
Post by NMcKay on Aug 4, 2005 22:09:23 GMT -8
im up for more K class. they seem to do the job they were designed for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane on Sept 3, 2005 10:28:43 GMT -8
I agree with HL.
K class are good ships and you never have problems with them, mabye larger K class style ships could be built?
|
|
|
|
Post by cascade on Sept 5, 2005 11:00:53 GMT -8
Anything that floats and can carry passengers and cars safely, plus a very big important part - is easy to fix - like things called an engine and gear box and for Miss Union a clutch that works....
oh yeah it should look good - and be cheap to run...just like a nice women...low cost - not high maintance...
|
|
|
|
Post by Engineer on Sept 5, 2005 12:30:38 GMT -8
Guess Iam a bit bias, but more Cumberland class .....would be great, just put a better class of Rads in them this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Sept 5, 2005 13:49:40 GMT -8
and also better interior instead of seats that are used as strength for your car
|
|
|
|
Post by NMcKay on Sept 5, 2005 13:55:45 GMT -8
the reason that the RADS dont work, and that they only have 10, is because when they were being built the company lookd at thier designs and realised...OMG its too short, so they lopped them in the middle, and added like 5 feet to each of them. so that the props would be in the water. thats why they are unique.
|
|
|
|
Post by cascade on Sept 6, 2005 6:48:04 GMT -8
Who is the person or committee that spec's out the vessel they need within BCFS ?
Why don't we hear anything about them in the press?
No one seems to take credit for any design flaws or spec's like in Engines - gear boxes and for that matter interior layouts/design - why not?
Are they not proud of there work ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Engineer on Sept 6, 2005 13:00:16 GMT -8
the reason that the RADS dont work, and that they only have 10, is because when they were being built the company lookd at thier designs and realised...OMG its too short, so they lopped them in the middle, and added like 5 feet to each of them. so that the props would be in the water. thats why they are unique. There is alot more wrong than you think , but its too late to change now. New legs are the answer. |
|
