|
|
Post by Political Incorrectness on Aug 19, 2003 11:20:32 GMT -8
This goes from Excelent as the best awful as the worst
|
|
|
|
Post by Quinsam on Apr 25, 2005 20:08:05 GMT -8
I think they have been doing rather well, except the Pacificats, but the minor routes and vessels all look good and reliable.
|
|
|
|
Post by NMcKay on Apr 26, 2005 7:28:22 GMT -8
THe minor route seem to be doing okay. but the major route vessels need some work. and the alberni needs to be stretched to match her sisters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Apr 26, 2005 7:46:23 GMT -8
Thats the thing we need alot of things done here
|
|
|
|
Post by cascade on Apr 26, 2005 9:53:39 GMT -8
Considering the total mess that it was before 2003 - I think the current people have done OK - can do better - if the unions allow them.
They do need a lot of money - BUT spend well on key projects. The realy hard part is to which section / parts of the buisness do you spend the money on first ? New Vessels, update the old fleet, upgrade the terminals ?
|
|
|
|
Post by NMcKay on Apr 26, 2005 10:01:31 GMT -8
yeah. they need major modernization, but they seem to be doing a good job.
|
|
|
|
Post by cascade on Apr 26, 2005 10:44:35 GMT -8
So which parts in your view need the money thrown at it first? 1.Vessels 2. Terminals 3.Systems - IT ? 4. Staff - training / maint'ce 5. Others  ? |
|
|
|
Post by Engineer on Apr 26, 2005 12:13:56 GMT -8
no question about it
vessels.........................
|
|
|
|
Post by nolonger on Apr 26, 2005 14:48:31 GMT -8
Ditto. The vessels! Terminals are useless if there are no ships to go to them.
|
|
?