|
Post by Kahloke on Mar 5, 2016 6:41:52 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by PeninsulaExplorer on Mar 23, 2016 18:19:24 GMT -8
Next time this happens, they should consider the Hiyu to save the day!
|
|
Neil
Voyager 
Posts: 7,095
|
Post by Neil on Mar 23, 2016 21:56:35 GMT -8
Next time this happens, they should consider the Hiyu to save the day! Also makes me wonder, once again, why in such a small service area you have WSF, as well as Skagit, Whatcom, and Pierce counties providing ferry service, when the more dependable service model would be one provider with comprehensive service and planning capabilities. I just don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by EGfleet on Mar 24, 2016 5:48:07 GMT -8
Next time this happens, they should consider the Hiyu to save the day! Also makes me wonder, once again, why in such a small service area you have WSF, as well as Skagit, Whatcom, and Pierce counties providing ferry service, when the more dependable service model would be one provider with comprehensive service and planning capabilities. I just don't get it. It's a goofy thing with state law. The major routes served by Washington State Ferries are considered state highways. The other ferry routes are considered county roads and therefore are not part of the state highway system, and not eligible to be served by WSF. It wouldn't take much to change that, but I've always heard that the counties didn't want to be part of the state system.
|
|
Neil
Voyager 
Posts: 7,095
|
Post by Neil on Mar 24, 2016 11:05:37 GMT -8
Also makes me wonder, once again, why in such a small service area you have WSF, as well as Skagit, Whatcom, and Pierce counties providing ferry service, when the more dependable service model would be one provider with comprehensive service and planning capabilities. I just don't get it. It's a goofy thing with state law. The major routes served by Washington State Ferries are considered state highways. The other ferry routes are considered county roads and therefore are not part of the state highway system, and not eligible to be served by WSF. It wouldn't take much to change that, but I've always heard that the counties didn't want to be part of the state system. Now that I give it some thought, I believe that you or someone else explained the highway/county road situation before... I should have remembered that.
But why wouldn't counties want the state to take the ferries off their hands? Why would Pierce want to be stuck with maintaining two ferries to use one in serving two tiny communities? Do the counties get some of their ferry expenses covered by the state?
|
|
|
Post by Kahloke on Mar 24, 2016 11:27:54 GMT -8
It's a goofy thing with state law. The major routes served by Washington State Ferries are considered state highways. The other ferry routes are considered county roads and therefore are not part of the state highway system, and not eligible to be served by WSF. It wouldn't take much to change that, but I've always heard that the counties didn't want to be part of the state system. Now that I give it some thought, I believe that you or someone else explained the highway/county road situation before... I should have remembered that.
But why wouldn't counties want the state to take the ferries off their hands? Why would Pierce want to be stuck with maintaining two ferries to use one in serving two tiny communities? Do the counties get some of their ferry expenses covered by the state?
I wonder if it's the other way around? The counties may be more than willing to turn their ferry operations over to the state, but the state doesn't want them? I really don't know, but it seems like the state is having a hard enough time keeping WSF afloat, so to speak, and perhaps does not want the burden of additional ferries, and the associated infrastructure that goes with that.
|
|
|
Post by Barnacle on Mar 27, 2016 3:50:00 GMT -8
Now that I give it some thought, I believe that you or someone else explained the highway/county road situation before... I should have remembered that.
But why wouldn't counties want the state to take the ferries off their hands? Why would Pierce want to be stuck with maintaining two ferries to use one in serving two tiny communities? Do the counties get some of their ferry expenses covered by the state?
I wonder if it's the other way around? The counties may be more than willing to turn their ferry operations over to the state, but the state doesn't want them? I really don't know, but it seems like the state is having a hard enough time keeping WSF afloat, so to speak, and perhaps does not want the burden of additional ferries, and the associated infrastructure that goes with that. Most likely the counties would be happy to let WSF take them over as a means of budget relief. Olympia probably wouldn't go for that. 
|
|
FNS
Voyager 
The Empire Builder train of yesteryear in HO scale
Posts: 4,942
|
Post by FNS on Nov 8, 2017 16:21:14 GMT -8
Toidy issue aboard the CA:
From: Pierce County Ferry Rider Alert <listserv@civicplus.com&g... Subject: New Alert Bathrooms on the Christine Anderson closed until further notice (hopefully by noon 11/9/17); thanks. For www.co.pierce.wa.us
Bathrooms on the Christine Anderson are closed until further notice (hopefully will have tanks pumped by noon 11/9/17); thanks for your patience. Date: Nov 8, 2017 2:13 PM
Now, where must the crew go when there are no functioning heads aboard?
It's funny the folks at PC call "heads" aboard their ferries "bathrooms". I guess you don't need a rubber ducky to enter these.
|
|
|
Post by paulvanb on Nov 10, 2017 8:23:21 GMT -8
Toidy issue aboard the CA:
From: Pierce County Ferry Rider Alert <listserv@civicplus.com&g... Subject: New Alert Bathrooms on the Christine Anderson closed until further notice (hopefully by noon 11/9/17); thanks. For www.co.pierce.wa.us
Bathrooms on the Christine Anderson are closed until further notice (hopefully will have tanks pumped by noon 11/9/17); thanks for your patience. Date: Nov 8, 2017 2:13 PM
Now, where must the crew go when there are no functioning heads aboard?
It's funny the folks at PC call "heads" aboard their ferries "bathrooms". I guess you don't need a rubber ducky to enter these. Like the days of old, over the side!
|
|
Neil
Voyager 
Posts: 7,095
|
Post by Neil on Aug 10, 2018 18:05:50 GMT -8
Marine Traffic- which is sometimes wonky- is showing the Christine Anderson underway in Budd Inlet just north of Olympia. Can anyone shed any light on that?
|
|
|
Post by SS San Mateo on Aug 10, 2018 20:10:18 GMT -8
Marine Traffic- which is sometimes wonky- is showing the Christine Anderson underway in Budd Inlet just north of Olympia. Can anyone shed any light on that? Construction work at the tie-up slip at the Steilacoom dock, so the boat that is not in service will tie up in Olympia. www.theolympian.com/news/local/article214925440.html
|
|
|
Post by northwesterner on Aug 10, 2018 22:29:27 GMT -8
Marine Traffic- which is sometimes wonky- is showing the Christine Anderson underway in Budd Inlet just north of Olympia. Can anyone shed any light on that? Construction work at the tie-up slip at the Steilacoom dock, so the boat that is not in service will tie up in Olympia. www.theolympian.com/news/local/article214925440.htmlTimely post... presumably the Steilacoom II shuttled emergency response over to Ketron Island tonight after the stolen Horizon Airlines Q400 crash.
|
|
|
Post by SS San Mateo on Mar 18, 2019 11:13:12 GMT -8
This showed up in my e-mail this morning: "The contractor for the M/V Steilacoom II dry dock project is in bankruptcy. Included below is the update on this situation that we provided to the Anderson Island Citizen Advisory Board on Thursday, March 14. We also want to share this information with you. AICAB UPDATE: We continue to closely follow the bankruptcy filing by our dry dock contractor. There was a court hearing Wednesday, March 13 where the court decided not to convert the bankruptcy into a liquidation. The court refused to convert the bankruptcy into a liquidation based on Pierce County’s request to allow time to complete work on the Steilacoom II. We are cautiously optimistic that the court’s direction will allow the contractor to complete the work. If the company does convert to Chapter 7, the county already has a plan in place to work with our bonding company and the bank to ensure that crews will still complete our project. The snow storm and other wind storms in Whatcom County have delayed the project by about three weeks. The project is currently 60% complete. The resurfacing of the car deck and much of the painting are complete. The shafts are with the subconsultant for repair work. The work is monitored for quality every day by our marine engineering consultant. We anticipate having the Steilacoom II back in May. We regret the unavoidable delay, but are confident the project will be completed to our expectations." The shipyard is Fairhaven Shipyard, owned by Puglia Engineering. They filed for bankruptcy last year. www.bellinghamherald.com/news/business/article209121579.html
|
|
|
Post by SS San Mateo on Aug 21, 2021 11:58:51 GMT -8
Pierce County has been having staffing problems as well. Two boat service on weekends has been cancelled every weekend since last month.
|
|