|
Post by Mike on Feb 6, 2012 15:10:36 GMT -8
Father and son observe the Queen of Burnaby arriving at Little River.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 6, 2012 16:11:19 GMT -8
Burnaby will be out of service for "several days" with the port-side propeller shaft problem. From Powell River Peak: from here: www.prpeak.com/articles/2012/02/06/news/doc4f30277623968575330033.txtThis issue might turn into something bigger, or at least be part of a long-term trend of "old ship is breaking-down too often", so that's why I'm putting this short-term stuff into the ship's permanent thread.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 6, 2012 17:38:35 GMT -8
Burnaby will be replaced by NIP for (at least) 3 days
The shuttle-bus for foot pax essential-appointments is a nice touch.
Good thing the Tachek is available to allow the NIP to fill-in at Comox. - if Tachek were getting her rebuild done this year, then this wouldn't be possible (assuming that Chilliwack would have been in refit too at same time).
|
|
|
Post by Scott (Former Account) on Feb 6, 2012 20:58:56 GMT -8
The Queen of Burnaby is currently at Berth 1, Departure Bay.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 7, 2012 7:02:22 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Feb 7, 2012 22:21:29 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Scott (Former Account) on Feb 8, 2012 19:16:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by lmtengs on Feb 8, 2012 20:32:32 GMT -8
The Bs used to be the 'big boat's of the fleet... now look at the Burnaby against the Inspiration... makes me wonder what kind of ships we'll have being put into service 40 years from now!
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 8, 2012 22:53:45 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Northern Exploration on Feb 9, 2012 8:56:24 GMT -8
The Bs used to be the 'big boat's of the fleet... now look at the Burnaby against the Inspiration... makes me wonder what kind of ships we'll have being put into service 40 years from now! As a kid the Burnaby seemed big.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 9, 2012 9:02:00 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Feb 9, 2012 10:19:21 GMT -8
The Bs used to be the 'big boat's of the fleet... now look at the Burnaby against the Inspiration... makes me wonder what kind of ships we'll have being put into service 40 years from now! Its funny how that works... The seven 'stretched' sisters (V's & B's) did look pretty big along side the originals Sidney & Tsawwassen. But then along came the C class and suddenly the stretched sisters were not so big. And then they lifted five of the sisters such that they were close to the same size as the C's. Then later, in the 1990's along came the Spirits, and after 2000 the Coast Boats. Will the trend to ever bigger continue? Not if declining traffic continues as has been the case over recent years.
|
|
mrdot
Voyager
Mr. DOT
Posts: 1,252
|
Post by mrdot on Feb 9, 2012 11:05:32 GMT -8
:)yes, indeed that's funny how that works, the biggest double-enders in the world? and the biggest new shibbuilding programme in the province's history, what a load of hoohy! and a future of wall mart wage earners! ::)mrdot.
|
|
|
Post by priver on Feb 9, 2012 20:16:53 GMT -8
Does anyone know why when the NIP is running the comox route they bring it into westview bow first instead of stern first like when it is running the texada run. I also was just at the dock at they were trying the tachek bow first I guess as a trial for next week when it also will do a few runs to comox.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 9, 2012 20:58:37 GMT -8
Does anyone know why when the NIP is running the comox route they bring it into westview bow first instead of stern first like when it is running the texada run. I also was just at the dock at they were trying the tachek bow first I guess as a trial for next week when it also will do a few runs to comox. I believe the issue is that the dock-apron at Little River can't fit a raised-bow ship (like the northern minors). Westview must be different, maybe a bit narrower apron or tapered. Back in July 2007 when Tachek filled-in on route-9, she needed a wooden fitting for the indented part of her raised-bow.
|
|
|
Post by Ferryman on Feb 10, 2012 9:18:45 GMT -8
The Queen of Burnaby has departed Departure Bay about half an hour ago. She's now bound for Esquimalt Graving Dock.
|
|
|
Post by Northern Exploration on Feb 10, 2012 17:35:01 GMT -8
:)yes, indeed that's funny how that works, the biggest double-enders in the world? and the biggest new shibbuilding programme in the province's history, what a load of hoohy! and a future of wall mart wage earners! ::)mrdot. All Jimmy did there was hand over a wad of cash. If he was running it I would be afraid he would fire the sickest person each month for lack of healing .
|
|
mrdot
Voyager
Mr. DOT
Posts: 1,252
|
Post by mrdot on Feb 11, 2012 10:34:33 GMT -8
:)It is common knowledge that jimmy p. is a hard taskmaster, much like the biblical master that gives out the talents in a parable, but propably what we ourselves should be concerned with is what we give of ourselves! mrdot.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 11, 2012 14:03:42 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by cmontgomery on Feb 11, 2012 18:12:43 GMT -8
Mr. Horn: thanks for the link to my post. I have to apologize for the brain freeze. They're working on the propeller hub of the ferry, so of course it's a propulsion problem, not a steering problem, as I for some reason referred to it. Think twice, type once, or however that goes. And yes, my point is that if you look at some of the issues still at play at BCFS, they point to certain kinds of solutions. We all read it differently, of course: to me, it spells the need for more real-life maritime expertise, maybe brought in from one of the world's big, nimble ferry services. Someone who can do fuel hedging really aggressively and cut that expense line down as far as humanly possible, for example. Someone who understands what regular maintenance needs to look like, and says so. (I find the idea that ships are getting older and yet coming out of the water for routine maintenance, never mind refits, troubling.) Someone who understands the need to standardize parts, bridge equipment and layouts as much as possible, that sort of thing. I guess overall, all you can hope when things go wrong is that you learn whatever lesson there is to be learned. Anyway, my apologies for the error. Chris Montgomery
|
|
|
Post by cmontgomery on Feb 11, 2012 21:20:56 GMT -8
Oh dear. Just reread my post. How unintentionally hilarious. What I meant to say is that I find the idea that ships are getting older but coming out of the water LESS OFTEN for maintenance and refits is troubling... Think twice, write once, proofread twice. Sorry. Chris Montgomery
|
|
|
Post by glasseye on Feb 11, 2012 22:14:31 GMT -8
They're working on the propeller hub of the ferry, so of course it's a propulsion problem, not a steering problem, as I for some reason referred to it. It's possible for it to be both a propulsion and steering problem. If the hub components are broken in such a way that the CPP system on that prop is inoperable, then the Burnaby will have much less steering authority than normal. Twin shaft ships use differential CPP or differential RPM settings between the two shafts to maintain steerage at low speed.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 17, 2012 16:54:22 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 18, 2012 12:28:46 GMT -8
You won't find this information anywhere on the BCFS website, but Deborah Marshall is quoted in the Powell River Peak as saying that the 'Burrnaby's return is delayed 24-hours until Tuesday, because they couldn't re-flood the drydock today (because of high winds at Esquimalt).
So sea-trials are now postponed until Sunday.
....but please don't think that the BCFS website will keep you updated on this type of stuff. According to BCFS's website, the 'Burnaby is expected back late last week.
|
|
|
Post by Scott (Former Account) on Feb 19, 2012 15:41:47 GMT -8
Queen of Burnaby is on the move... Currently off Pender Island, heading towards Active Pass at 13.6 knots.
|
|