|
Post by Ferryman on Sept 17, 2006 17:40:31 GMT -8
Interesting. You learn something new everyday.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 26, 2007 0:10:18 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Queen of Nanaimo Teen on Jan 26, 2007 15:51:23 GMT -8
Wow, great photo. Thanks for posting it! Oh, and did anybody notice she has 3 lifeboats on 1 side instead of one? Just thought I might point that out ;D
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 26, 2007 17:21:15 GMT -8
Wow, great photo. Thanks for posting it! Oh, and did anybody notice she has 3 lifeboats on 1 side instead of one? Just thought I might point that out ;D Actually it is four lifeboats per side. One is further forward than the other three - look closely. JST
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 28, 2007 14:49:55 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jan 28, 2007 15:09:02 GMT -8
re the above Q-Surrey 1977 photo:
- seeing as how she has her visor up, and her funnel is smoking, I presume that she was in-service, while that photo was taken?
Or was she just laid-up there?
I just assumed that Q-Surrey only ran on Route-2 for 1974-1976, and was decommissioned after the Cowichan/Coquitlam started service.
Did the old Surrey every work Route-1, in 1977?
Assuming that she's just "sitting idle" at Swartz Bay, then that might explain why she's berthed bow-in at Swartz.
Jim, can you please clarify?
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 28, 2007 15:22:29 GMT -8
re the above Q-Surrey 1977 photo: - seeing as how she has her visor up, and her funnel is smoking, I presume that she was in-service, while that photo was taken? Or was she just laid-up there? I just assumed that Q-Surrey only ran on Route-2 for 1974-1976, and was decommissioned after the Cowichan/Coquitlam started service. Did the old Surrey every work Route-1, in 1977? Assuming that she's just "sitting idle" at Swartz Bay, then that might explain why she's berthed bow-in at Swartz. Jim, can you please clarify? Thanks! The old Surrey never was used in revenue service on Route 1 or any other route between the time it was taken off Route 2 and when it entered northern service in 1980 as the QotN. It spent a lot of time laid up at Swartz Bay during the winters, and at Deas during the summers. In this photo the funnel is smoking and that indicates to me that I was in the right place at the right time. They must have been just firing up the engines as something that needed to be done every so often, or perhaps they were preparing to move her out as this berth would have been freed up for service over the summer months. As to why she was in bow first I do not know except that ferries are often stored bow-in at Swartz.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 28, 2007 19:08:31 GMT -8
For another more close up view of the Surrey ( QotN) at SWB in June 1977 click here
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jan 28, 2007 19:32:35 GMT -8
Jim: When you saw that ship in 1977 at Swartz, did you think to yourself that "gee, that would be a great ship for the inside-passage service...." ?
I wonder why it took until 1979 or so until they (BC Ferries) made the decision on how to use this fine ship.
I suppose that it had something to do with the fact that the QPR was doing fine on the Inside Passage, and that there was not yet a Queen Charlottes run being done.
But Jim, surely you must have seen the potential when you saw her, back in 1977..........
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Jan 28, 2007 21:52:16 GMT -8
Jim: When you saw that ship in 1977 at Swartz, did you think to yourself that "gee, that would be a great ship for the inside-passage service...." ? I wonder why it took until 1979 or so until they (BC Ferries) made the decision on how to use this fine ship. I suppose that it had something to do with the fact that the QPR was doing fine on the Inside Passage, and that there was not yet a Queen Charlottes run being done. But Jim, surely you must have seen the potential when you saw her, back in 1977.......... Ironically no.... I was, at the time the photo was taken (early June 1977), on my way from Victoria to Vancouver for a wedding. One of my brothers was getting hitched. (I come from a big family, having six brothers & two sisters.) I was with my parents and I was at the time a resident of Sooke, where I lived with my parents. Northern ferry service did not, at that time, loom large in my consciousness. At that time I was an unemployed 'bum', having completed a BA degree at UVic the previous year. I was trying to figure out what to do with my life. A lot of people in their early 20's tell me similar stories. Also at that time I had another brother living in Kitimat, having almost completed his first year of teaching here. He told me to come on up - there were lots of jobs. After the wedding that is exactly what I did. As they say, the rest is history. I have been here for almost 30 years now. And northern ferry service is something that became very important to me, and remains so. As to the original Queen of Surrey... I believe that it was known generally within BC Ferries and knowledgeable people in the maritime life of BC that she would make a fine addition to the northern fleet. But BCF opted to do nothing until BC Steamship Company (then a provincial crown corp running the Princess Marguerite) said that they wanted to acquire her to replace the Maggie. BC Ferries gave them the Rupert instead.
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Jan 28, 2007 22:06:23 GMT -8
Thanks for that story, Jim.
I remember seeing the Queen of Surrey for the first time, in 1974 or 1975, coming back from a family trip to the Okanagan. I would have been in Grade 2 or 3 at the time....so I was a little tyke, but I was interested in detail stuff of names/places/geography, even back then.
So I was really fascinated by seeing Queen of Surrey, berthed bow-in at Horseshoe Bay, with that "strange looking" bow visor raised. I had never seen anything like that before.
I remember my mom telling me that "that ship used to swim in the Atlantic....", or something like that.
Unfortunately, I don't have any memories of the interior of Q-Surrey back then........I guess that my photographic-memory is a bit sketchy...or maybe my brain ran out of film.
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Jan 28, 2007 23:51:44 GMT -8
Very Intresting Information. That explains why the QPR ended up doing the Seattle-Victoria Route.
Now I'll add some info from some past posts here... If memory serves me right...on this forum, I believe somebody posted ages ago while talking about the Northbound Positioning Cruise (Tsawwassen to Port Hardy) the QotN used to do and he said that the QotN was the first ship to have a Children Play Area. And if my memory goes further into remembering, correct me if I'm wrong, I think another person mentioned she once had a disco. If she did then that's just Groovy.
|
|
|
Post by queenofcowichan on Jan 29, 2007 16:27:02 GMT -8
2 of those lifeboats are in service as the Protection Connection. The Island Mist and Island Queen are former lifeboats to the Queen of Surrey. They opperate from the Dingy Dock Pub to Nanaimo Harbour.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Feb 6, 2007 23:11:44 GMT -8
Queen of Surrey the first again for this photo history installment. This view, taken at Horseshoe Bay in August 1974, shows the modifications made to the bow close up. The photo, part of the DOT collection, originates, I believe, from BC Ferries.
|
|
|
Post by queenofcowichan on Feb 7, 2007 15:07:39 GMT -8
Nice pict of the Queen of Surrey. Let me see if I got this straight, The visor lifts up as the ship nears the berth and the onboard ramp would be lowerd onto the deck and the shore ramp would be lowered onto the bow? Is this correct? Re The third PC boat, yes I did see the third boat when I went over to Protection 2 years ago to take pictures of the Norwegian Sun. But as of last week I have yet to see it in service And I have no Idea which ferry this lifeboat would have come from,
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Feb 7, 2007 18:42:35 GMT -8
Great photograph of the former Queen of Surrey and her unique bow sponson, Jim. Nice pict of the Queen of Surrey. Let me see if I got this straight, The visor lifts up as the ship nears the berth and the onboard ramp would be lowerd onto the deck and the shore ramp would be lowered onto the bow? Is this correct? Good question - were the modifications to the bow more extensive than just the sponson? Here are a few pics of her as the Queen of the North, showing her inner ramp Cheers, Graham
|
|
|
Post by Northern Exploration on Feb 8, 2007 15:59:32 GMT -8
When you were a foot passenger you barely noticed the inner ramp. I don't remember if the stern had a similar arrangement or not. You can see the inner doors if you look closely. The "nose" came down and the inner doors swung shut.
|
|
|
Post by queenofcowichan on Feb 8, 2007 19:44:34 GMT -8
I Remember when arriving at Port Hardy at the end of the Positioning cruises I was on in the early 1990's the policy was for foot passengers to remain up top untill the vehicles were off loaded. I remember watching from the top lounge The visor been lifted up. It looked weired for me to see the front end been raised.
The Stern of the Queen of The North and QPR is basically the same as the other ships in the fleet alowing the ship to dock at any of the southern docks.
|
|
|
Post by hergfest on Feb 8, 2007 21:33:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Low Light Mike on Feb 8, 2007 21:41:45 GMT -8
Thank you, thank you ! The shot of Q-Surrey turning-around in Departure Bay is something I had hoped to see a photo of.
Excellent !
|
|
|
Post by Ferryman on Feb 8, 2007 21:41:46 GMT -8
Beautiful Picture. I've never seen a picture of her in Departure Bay until..........just now.
|
|
|
Post by Curtis on Feb 8, 2007 21:59:57 GMT -8
That's another excellent photo of the Queen of Surrey I
|
|
|
Post by hergfest on Feb 8, 2007 22:46:49 GMT -8
You can thank my Dad. He said he was suprised as hell when she turned the corner, had never seen her before. I think he said they had just missed the earlier boat too.
|
|
|
Post by WettCoast on Feb 9, 2007 0:12:19 GMT -8
Hergfest, your father snapped a true beauty. This photo belongs in our current Miss March contest. I have taken liberties as you see below. To enter just say yes. And to you and your dad I say Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by Retrovision on Feb 9, 2007 0:49:20 GMT -8
Hergfest, your father snapped a true beauty. This photo belongs in our current Miss March contest. I have taken liberties as you see below. To enter just say yes. And to you and your dad I say Thank you! Hergfest If there were ever a flagship header photograph that deserved to run in such a contest unopposed, it certainly would be that one. Thank you, Jim, for taking the liberty to create that great banner.
|
|